TUM – Technical University of Munich Menu
Mit der Umwelt-DNA-Analyse werden Gewässerlebewesen nachweisbar, ohne dass sie gefangen werden müssen: Bernhard Stoeckle (re.) holt sich dafür eine Wasserflasche mit Flüssigkeit aus einem Bach. Links neben ihm Sebastian Beggel, während Prof. Jürgen Geist hinten auf die Proben wartet. (Foto: A. Heddergott/ TUM)
Mit der Umwelt-DNA-Analyse werden Gewässerlebewesen nachweisbar, ohne dass sie gefangen werden müssen: Bernhard Stoeckle (re.) holt sich dafür eine Wasserflasche mit Flüssigkeit aus einem Bach. Links neben ihm Sebastian Beggel, während Prof. Jürgen Geist hinten auf die Proben wartet. (Foto: A. Heddergott/ TUM)
  • Research news

Which water body conditions influence environmental DNA analysis?

Species identification in the water bottle

Environmental DNA analysis makes it possible to detect water organisms without having to capture them first. For the first time, a team at the Technical University of Munich (TUM) systematically investigated the effect of various environmental factors on environmental DNA analyses. By doing so, the researchers have made an important step towards the standardized application of this method for the monitoring of water bodies.

DNA that animals release into aquatic environment can be detected using molecular analysis. This detection method is called environmental DNA (eDNA) A simple water sample is sufficient for this technique. However, this method does not work equally well in all water bodies and is therefore very likely to be influenced by the respective conditions in each body of water. This may include organic and inorganic components in the water or the flow conditions. So far, there is almost no research on how strongly the individual factors affect the analysis procedure.

Dr. Bernhard Stoeckle and Dr. Sebastian Beggel, researchers at the Chair of Aquatic Systems Biology and the Unit of Molecular Zoology (Chair of Zoology) at TUM investigated the influence of a wide range of environmental factors on eDNA analysis in an experiment. The idea for the experiment was based on a previous eDNA study on a native mussel species.

Systematic experimental structure

In a systematic laboratory setup, fish belonging to an invasive species — the round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) — were kept in aquaria in varying densities, under various flow conditions, with and without sediment, and were removed from the water after a defined period of time.

Subsequently, the researchers took water samples at regular intervals over a period of six days in order to be able to evaluate the efficiency of the eDNA analysis over time as well. In addition, the researchers added several substances, which could potentially hinder molecular analysis such as algae, humic substances, and inorganic suspended particles to the water, which are also found in natural ecosystems.

“That’s particularly important, otherwise we wouldn’t be able to apply the findings to eDNA studies in the field,” Bernhard Stoeckle explained. In order to find out which factors have the greatest influence, the researchers then compared the eDNA results of all water samples with each other.

Extent of influence of factors changes over time

On the one hand, the evaluation of the experiment showed that, over its entire duration, the flow conditions, the existence or absence of sediment, and the fish density only had an effect on the analyses in combination with each other. On the other hand, it turned out that the extent of the influence of the factors changed greatly over time.

Of the inhibitors added, organic substances (humic substances) interfered with the analyses the most. They often entirely precluded the successful application of the method. DNA could only be detected in 41 percent of the samples examined. Algae also had a comparable effect, albeit less pronounced. “Our findings clearly demonstrate how important it is that environmental conditions are also taken into account when performing eDNA analyses in order to be able to correctly interpret the findings,” said Bernhard Stoeckle.

Based on the results of the experiment, it can be concluded that specific environmental conditions interfere greatly with environmental DNA experiments, in some cases making it difficult or even impossible to detect species.

Pictures for editorial coverage

Publication:

Stoeckle, BC., Beggel, S., Cerwenka, AF., Motivans, E., Kuehn, R., Geist, J.: A systematic approach to evaluate the influence of environmental conditions on eDNA detection success in aquatic ecosystems, PLoS One 12/2017. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189119.

Contact:

Prof. Dr. Jürgen Geist
Technical University of Munich
Chair of Aquatic Systems Biology
Phone: +49/8161/71-3974
Mail: geist(at)wzw.tum.de

Corporate Communications Center

Technical University of Munich

Article at tum.de

Forelle (Bild: Eric Engbretson for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)

The virus detectives

Every summer in Southern Germany, Austria and Switzerland, tons of brown trout perish. An interdisciplinary team from the Technical University of Munich (TUM) has now discovered the culprit of the mysterious dying...

Kesslergrundeln und weitere Grundelarten aus dem Schwarzen Meer kamen ursprünglich über das Ballastwasser der Schiffe nach Bayern und sind heute vor allem in der Donau und im Main stark vertreten.  (Bild: J. Geist/ TUM)

Changing fish stocks

The majority of Bavaria's watercourses are in poor ecological condition. A team from the Technical University of Munich (TUM) has now conducted the first systematic analysis of long-term data on fish stocks in the Upper...

Was führt zu der Entscheidung, wohin jemand schaut, wenn nichts Bestimmtes gesucht wird und zunächst unklar ist, wohin sich der Blick richten sollte? (Foto: iStockphoto/ praetorianphoto)

What catches our eye

Our unconscious gaze is controlled by an automatic selection process computed by a neural network in the brain. Details of this computation have now been studied  by an international team collaborating with the Technical...

Schrotkugeln aus verschiedenen Materialtypen wurden für die Studie getestet. (Bild: A. Göttlein/ TUM)

Ammunition with risks and side effects

Hunting with lead shot is highly restricted or entirely banned in many countries due to the danger of poisoning birds and environment. However, alternative ammunition is not without its own risks, as was discovered in a...

Die Durchströmung ist für den Boden eines Gewässers entscheidend und die Chance, den Flusslauf zu verändern, dadurch entsteht Lebensraum. (Foto: TUM/J. Geist)

Preservation of floodplains is flood protection

The silting of rivers and streams leads to problems for fish, mussels, and other aquatic organisms because their habitats disappear. However, not only intensive agriculture and erosion are destroying these habitats. Now a...

Zeitgleich mit der Invasion der so genannten Killer-Shrimps oder des Großen Höckerflohkrebses seit Beginn der 1990er-Jahre sind die Bestände vieler heimischer wirbelloser Tierarten in Mitteleuropa zurückgegangen. (Foto: J. Brandner/ TUM)

The killer shrimp is not as bad as its reputation

Researchers at the Technical University of Munich (TUM) have discovered that the amphipod crustacean, which is native to the Ponto-Caspian region, is not a true predator and only plays an indirect role in the massive...

Die vom Aussterben bedrohte Flussperlmuschel (Margaritifera margaritifera). Von den knapp 70 in Deutschland existierenden Beständen gab es nur in zweien innerhalb der vergangenen 50 Jahre genügend Nachwuchs, um den Fortbestand zu sichern. Die Art hat es damit nur ihrem hohen Alter – sie wird weit über 100 Jahre alt – zu verdanken, dass sie bei uns noch nicht ausgestorben ist. (Foto: TUM/ Geist)

The Status Quo on Europe’s Mussels

Mussels are the natural treatment plants of bodies of water and, therefore, just as important as bees. Unfortunately, they are equally threatened: most of the world’s mussel stocks are in decline and some species face...

Für die Studien sind mehrere Arten im belasteten Gewässer beobachtet worden, auch die weniger gängigen bei solchen Tests wie etwa Mini-Schnecken oder Ruderfußkrebse. (Foto: Hasenbein)

Waters are more polluted than tests say

Bodies of water are “sinks”, and thereby bind contaminants particularly well. If even slightly toxic concentrations in water are to be detected, the growth and swimming behavior of small crustaceans, mini-snails and...